12
December 1998
Never
too late to address weaknesses of our health care system
(Keywords:-
HMO, quality audit, private sector)
There were days when the words and actions of
doctors were al supremo. Yet, with the development of an open
society; with the advent of citizens and patients rights; with
litigations at the drop of the hat, the days when doctors are demi-gods
are gone.
This is a good thing for like every profession and trade, the
medical profession have to be accountable to what they do --
accountable to the patients they serve, and accountable to the peers
of their profession. Accountability also means better rapport with
their patients, and accountability will keep them on toes to do
things properly and in keeping with the cutting edge of medical
advancements.
Amongst all these, however, two principles in medical
practice should never be undermined.
Whilst medicine is a science, the practice of medicine is an
art. In short, there is the element of previous experience, previous
examples, gut feeling or sixth sense that prevails. It is something
that is between the doctors and patients for total understanding.
That is what the time honoured doctor-patient relationship is all
about.
Secondly, there is the all important concept of professional
autonomy. The standard of practice of a profession must be the
prerogative of peer assessment based on standards -- standards which
are derived from collective decisions determined by experiences
locally and internationally and evidence-based medicine. In the
delivery of care, the doctor in charge must be the one who knows
best. He formulates the treatment procedures with his patient, who
has the right to choose for other options.
Any interference by the state, the government, on what to
treat and in particular how to treat violate the autonomy and will
not be in the patientsˇ¦ best interest.
Take the recent controversy on liver transplant. The law is
to prohibit organ sale. This all parties fully accept. Yet, when a
transplant was not allowed to proceed simply because a consent form
for operation was not signed in compliance with the law and the
patient was in coma, controversy abounds. Without pre-empting, there
is a problem of how much the law could or should override
professional autonomy and judgment, when a life is at stake.
The worse scenario would be when a profiteering middle-man
steps in between the patient and the profession. Under the disguise
of managed care, the middle-man controls how to treat, what to treat
and what to give for treatment basing on the lowest cost so that he
can get the highest gain. The patients suffer, the doctors left
dejected, the doctor-patient relationship shattered, and the health
maintenance organisationsˇ¦ executives get away with the profit.
Whilst Hong Kong has much strength in health care, we have
also many weaknesses. One weakness is that it is fragmented,
compartmentalised and lacking rapport
between the public and private sectors. It is time for reform, if it
is not already too late. The fact remains that Government has not
taken the initiative of introducing or formulating up-to-date health
care policies for a quarter of a century.
Another area of weakness is that there is no audit of outcome
of care. The Hospital Authority has started to do this, but a lot of
work has yet to be done by our private counterparts. Yes, the
private hospitals can come up with self assessing medical
committees. The market force will also regulate. Yet, our patients
may not be that well informed or knowledgeable to make the
distinction.
Doctors must be accountable for what they do --
accountable not just to the patients, accountable not just to
their peers, but accountable too to the health care system and the
society. There is thus a dire need to set up some forms of a total
outcome care audit. Should this be done by a body from the
profession or in association with the consumers and government? This
must be debated and yet it must be the way forward.
(Hongkong Standard)
|